COCP No.4649 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 139 KHEMCHAND BHASKER AND ORS Vs SHRUTI SINGH, IAS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate for Mr. for the petitioner Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned instance of the petitioners was disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.04.2018 passed in CWP No.7001 of 2013 titled Punjab and others, Hon’ble Apex Court vide decision dated 02 No.(s) 3331 of 2020. 2. In view of the above, the present petition at this stage, however, seeks li petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned SLP. 3. Disposed of 4. Rule stands discharged. July 10, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4649 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: KHEMCHAND BHASKER AND ORS SHRUTI SINGH, IAS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the writ petition filed at the instance of the petitioners was disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.04.2018 passed in CWP No.7001 of 2013 titled ‘Daljeet Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others, whereas the operation of said decis Hon’ble Apex Court vide decision dated 02.03.2020 passed in SLP(Civil) D No.(s) 3331 of 2020. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner the present petition at this stage, however, seeks li petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned SLP. Disposed of being not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4649 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA submits that the writ petition filed at the instance of the petitioners was disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.04.2018 ‘Daljeet Singh and others vs. State of whereas the operation of said decision has been stayed by the .03.2020 passed in SLP(Civil) Di learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned SLP. not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 submits that the writ petition filed at the instance of the petitioners was disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.04.2018 ‘Daljeet Singh and others vs. State of ion has been stayed by the iary does not press berty to revive the present MOHMED ATIK 2025.07.11 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment