SANJEEV KUMAR @ SANJIB KUMAR AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./1083/2025 · 2025-04-09
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10522 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10522 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010074752025
2025:GAU-AS:4568
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1083/2025 SANJEEV KUMAR @ SANJIB KUMAR AND ANR. S/O- SRI SUBHASH CHAND, R/O- VILL- SHAHABAD, PS- SHAHABAD, DIST- KURUKSHETRA, (HARYANA), PIN- 136135 2: SUNNY @ RANVEER ARORA S/O- SRI SUBHASH CHAND R/O- VILL- SHAHABAD PS- SHAHABAD DIST- KURUKSHETRA (HARYANA) PIN- 13613 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K DAS, MR. RASHIDUL ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 10.04.2025
1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. R.Islam for the petitioners 1.Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjib Kumar and 2.Sunny @ Ranveer Arora who have filed this application
Page No.# 2/3 under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 with prayer for bail as they are behind bars since 30.03.2025 in connection with Dispur PS Case No. 296/2025 under Sections 112(2)/305(b)/305(c)/317(2)/317(4)/317(5)/324 (5) of the BNS. 2. Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor Mr.K.K.Das is present for the respondent State. 3. A truck was stolen from the parking area in front of Sai Baba Mandir Road and it was reduced to scrap and thereafter the scrap was transported to be sold. 4. It is submitted by learned Addl.Publc Prosecutor that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the petitioners. They have been involved in an organised crime of selling trucks and dismantling trucks into scrap and selling iron scrap outside Assam. 5. I have also scrutinized the Case Dairy. Indeed there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary that the petitioners are complicit. Investigation has progressed substantially. It appears that further custodial detention of the petitioners may not be required for further investigation. The petitioners are willing to co-operate with the remaining part of the investigation. The petitioners have also pledged to abide by any conditions if imposed upon them. 6. Considering all aspects, prayer for bail is allowed. 7. The petitioners named above shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- each with a local surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M), Guwahati subject to the following conditions: i) The petitioners shall appear before the I.O. every fortnight till completion of the investigation,
Page No.# 3/3 ii) The petitioners shall refrain from committing any such activities of which they are alleged. 8.
On breach of any of the above conditions, learned court is at liberty to immediately cancel bail granted to the petitioner. 9. In terms of the above observations, the bail application stands disposed of. 10. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant