Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10521 (AP)

Mannava Harinadh Babu v. B. Anil Kumar

CC/766/2025 · 2025-06-18

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.766 of 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the Respondents herein for their wilful disobedience and deliberate violation of the order of this Hon’ble Court, dated 06.02.2025 made in W.P. No. 2836 of 2025. Between: Mannava Harinadh Babu, S/o. Uma Maheswara Rao, Hindu, Aged 46 Years, Resident of Flat No. 4, Sri Ganesh Nilayam, 1®* Lane, 2'^'^ Cross Road, Navabharat Nagar, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522 006. ...Petitioner AND 1. B. Anil Kumar, S/o Unknown, Age Unknown, Occ; The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Circle Sastra Centre, #27-3340,1®* Floor Gudavalli Vari Street, Besant Road Cross, Governor Pet, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh- 520002. 2. N.Kasi Babu, S/o Unknown, Age Unknown, Occ: The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, #6-21-108, 2"^* Cross Road, 4**^ Lane, Arundalpet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522 001. ...Respondents/Contemnors : Sri Khaja Khutubuddin Shaik Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri Prudvi Raju Mudunuri Counsel for Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following: Counsel for the Petitioner APHCOI 0120062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Sr.No.-25 AT AMARAVATI % [3446] CONTEMPT CASE NO: 766 of 2025 Mannava Harinadh Babu ...Petitioner Vs. B. Anil Kumar and another ...Contemnors ■kie******** Advocate for petitioner Advocate for contemnors Sri Khaja Khutubuddin Shaik Sri Prudvi Raju Mudunuri CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 19th June 2025 PC : Learned counsel for the respondent Bank makes a statement that there has been no violation of the orders passed by this Court in regard to maintenance of status quo with regard to the secured asset and that the property in question has not been sold as has been alleged by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is also stated that the sale notice was issued in the month of January, 2025, which was earlier than the order passed by this Court on 06.02.2025. 2. In that view of the matter, we do not find any merit in the present petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. 2 'fri- Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closefl. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER B. Anil Kumar, Occ; The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Circle Sastra Centre, #27-3340,1®* Floor, Gudavalli Vari Street, Besant Road Cross, Governor Pet, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh- 520002. N.Kasi^Babu, Occ; The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, #6-21- 108, 2 Cross Road, 4**^ Lane, Arundalpet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh- 522 001. One CC to Sri Khaja Khutubuddin Shaik, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Prudvi Raju Mudunuri, Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies To 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TK RAM w HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 ORDER CC.No.766 of 2025 ^ 0 ^ JUL 2025 vsCyrrent Sectioox^') ^•«£S£ai£ss^ Tn «o DISMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS