Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10519 (UTT)

CHETAN KUMAR PANDE v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1956/2021 · 2025-04-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1956 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Devesh Upreti, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder are present. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that the final report has been filed in the matter and the present writ petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.04.2025 AK