RAJESH TANEJA AND 2 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/20163/2024 · 2025-05-20
Madan Pal Singh, Siddhartha Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 105187 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 105187 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20163 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajesh Taneja And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Indra Jit Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Madan Pal Singh,J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Indra Jit Singh,
learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned A.G.A. are present.
2. Upon being informed that a charge-sheet has been submitted by the police in the instant matter and learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to avail such remedy as might be available under the law.
3. Under such circumstances, no further order is required to be passed.
4. The instant writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforeprayed.
Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Neeraj (Madan Pal Singh, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad