Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:76028 Court No. - 88 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38971 of 2024 Applicant :- Sanjeev Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Dwivedi,Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This bail application has been given by the accused applicant Sanjeev Singh in Case Crime No. 559 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) B.N.S. and 6/10 Public Examination Act, 2024, P.S.- Dakshin, District Firozabad. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the FIR the allegation against the applicant is that he was appearing in examination of UP Police constable 2023-24 at MGPG college Firozabad on 30.8.2024 in the name of Sanjeev Singh son of Lajjaram, Role no. 2297537 and date of birth shown as 5.5.1998; subsequently an information was received from control room that said student has shown his date of birth as 5.5.2004 in another school from where he passed high school examination in the year 2021 in the name of Sagar Singh, thus he had produced contradictory and fake documents to take benefit of age in the recruitment examination. Learned counsel submitted that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has filed e-KYC proforma for the post of constable civil police examination 2023 wherein his name is mentioned as Sanjeev Singh and his date of birth is shown as 5.5.1998. He has never shown his date of birth 5.5.2004 as stated in the FIR. He has filed intermediate marksheet also in which his name is shown as Sanjeev Singh son of Lajjaram and same date of birth is mentioned in the certificate. He has not derived any unlawful gain from the alleged offence. Applicant is languishing in jail since 30.8.2024 and undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if granted and cooperate in trial. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. However, he has not disputed the aforesaid facts. Having heard the submission of learned counsel of both sides, considering the fact of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Let applicant be released on bail in aforesaid case crime on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/ court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed for framing of charge, recording of evidence as well as recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. or through counsel on other dates and in case of absence without sufficient cause, it will be deemed that he is abusing the liberty of bail enabling the court concerned to take necessary action in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 Dhirendra/ Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad