Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105162 (ALL)

LOKPAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/36641/2024 · 2025-03-11

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36761-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36641 of 2024 Petitioner :- Lokpal Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Dev Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Baleshwar Chaturvedi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Leave is granted to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner to implead the District Magistrate, Bulandshahar as party to the case during the course of day. 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by inaction on part of the respondent no.3/District Magistrate, Bulandshahar in considering the representation of the petitioner dated August 1, 2024. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.3/District Magistrate, Bulandshahar should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated August 1, 2024. 5. Accordingly, the respondent no.3/District Magistrate, Bulandshahar is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner dated August 1, 2024 within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the distribution company. 6. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Dev (Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad