Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10516 (RAJ)

AJAY KUMAR MEHRA SON OF SHRI RAMKALYAN MEHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3491/2025 · 2025-03-12

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11377] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3491/2025 Ajay Kumar Mehra Son Of Shri Ramkalyan Mehra, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of 95, Narcotics Colony, Mahaveer Nagar First, Anandpura Phhota Talab, Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Joint Secretary, Medical And Health (Group-2/3) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Non-Gazetterd)-Cum- Additional Director (Admn.), Panchayati Raj (Medical) Department, Directorate Of Department And Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kota. 5. The Superintendent, Naveen Chikitsalay, Medical College, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Suresh Kumar Dhaka Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.; DB Special Appeal Writ No.249/2025, decided vide order dated 17.02.2023, wherein, respondent were directed to consider the possibilities of posting of the petitioner with spouse in accordance with spouse policy, has submitted that as instant matter as akin [2025:RJ-JP:11377] (2 of 2) [CW-3491/2025] factual narratives, therefore, similar directions can be passed in the instant matter also. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that if the petitioner files a representation, the same may be considered by the competent authority taking note of the hardship and administrative exigency. 3. Heard and considered. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, upon perusal of the records, this Court deems it apposite to disposed of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order, and respondent/competent authority is directed to consider the same within a period of 15 days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law, by way of speaking order, in light of the directions passed in Suresh Kumar Dhaka (supra). 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Diksha Mishra/Preeti Asopa /345