Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10516 (AP)

Pangi Santhosh, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/2534/2025 · 2025-03-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010119762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2534/2025 Between: Pangi Santhosh, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. DUGGIRALA SUBASH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the petitioner herein, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.73 of 2024 of Moothugudem Police Station, Alluri Sitharama Raju District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(b) of the BNS and Section 20(b)(ii)(C) read with 8(c) of the NDPS, Act. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, on 16.10.2024, the Sub Inspector of police along with his staff and mediators rushed to Daralamma Thalli Temple, Outskirts of Polluru Village, and caught the accused in possession of 2kgs of Liquid Ganja. The contraband along with other material was seized under the cover of mediators report. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State. Perused the material on record. 2 4. The petitioner herein was arrested on 16.10.2024 and since then he has been in judicial custody. The quantity of contraband involved in present crime is 2kgs of Liquid Ganja, which is a commercial quantity. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the case is still under investigation and some more witnesses are to be examined. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner does not deserve for grant of bail at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA,J Date: 17-03-2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2534 of 2025 DATE:17.03.2025 ASR