Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10515 (GAU)

PRANAB KUMAR BARMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 8 ORS.

WP(C)/200/2018 · 2025-02-20

Robin Phukan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010074362017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/200/2018 PRANAB KUMAR BARMAN S/O. LATE TARANI KANTA BARMAN, VILL. BYASKUCHI, P.S. SARTHEBARI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 8 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI. 2:THE MISSION DIRECTOR RMSA ASSAM. KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 3:THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA BARPETA ASSAM. 5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BARPETA BARPETA ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 6:MANOJ TALUKDAR IN-CHARGE HEAD MASTER OF BYASKUCHI HIGH SCHOOL P.S. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 7:SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (SMDC) BYASKUCHI HIGH SCHOOL DIST. BARPETA ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT-SRI PRABIN KUMAR BAISHYA. 8:SRI PRABIN KUMAR BAISHYA S/O. LATE BIJOY CHANDRA BAISHYA R/O. VILL. BYASKUCHI P.S. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 9:CHANDRAJIT DEKA S/O. LATE UDDHAB DEKA R/O. VILL. BYASKUCHI P.S. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA PIN-781307 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MS. B DEVI,MR S BORGOHAIN,MR. A AHMED,MR G GORLOSA,MR. I U CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SECONDARY EDUCATION, MR. M A SHEIKH(R 7-9),MR. M R Z CHOUDHURY(R 6-9),MS. D PARBIN(R 6-9),MS F RAHMAN(R 6-9),MS J H CHOUDHURY(R-6),MD. H BHUYAN(R 6-9),GA, ASSAM,MS.N. PHUKAN , EDUCATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 21.02.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. Page No.# 3/3 However, Mr. N.J. Khataniar, learned standing counsel for the Education Department and Mr. B. Deuri, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent No.4 are present. The record reveals that on two previous occasions i.e. 14.05.2020 and 06.05.2020 the petitioner remained absent without any step. In absence of the petitioner, this Court finds no just ground to adjourn the matter for another date and accordingly, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE