Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10515 (CHH)

MUKESH DILAWAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1360/2025 · 2025-04-04

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16026 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1360 of 2025 1 - Mukesh Dilawar S/o Shri Reshamlal Aged About 38 Years Old R/o Gram Kui Tehsil Kukdur District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Sub Divisional Officer Kabirdham District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Kabirdham District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Kabirdham District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5 - Superintendent Of Police Kabirdham Kabirdham District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Station House Officer Kabirdham Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 7 - Gram Panchayat Kui Through Sarpanch R/o Gram Panchayat Pandhariya District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 8 - Secretary (Sachiv) Gram Panchayat Kui R/o Gram Panchayat Kui Janpad Panchayat Pandhariya District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate For State :- Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 04.04.2025 1. Since the matter is now seized by the SDO, Kabirdham under Section 131 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code. As such, at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the SDO, Kabirdham raising his grievance along with all the documents which has been filed in this petition. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha