Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105110 (ALL)

RACHANA KATIYAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/10527/2024 · 2025-09-21

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10527 of 2024 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Anurag Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Raghuvansh Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Manav Chaurasiya, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No.65 of 2015, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Sections 13(1), 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station Jagdishpura, District Agra, with a prayer to enlarge her on anticipatory bail. 3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. pointed out that alongwith instant anticipatory bail application, an application u/s Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.35185 of 2023 (Rachna Katiyar vs. State of U.P. and Another) is connected and in this application applicant challenged the entire proceedings of the case and vide order dated 01.12.2023, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant and therefore, it reflects, instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous, as applicant is having no apprehension of her arrest. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant also conceded the fact that a separate application u/s Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant and in that application, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant and therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghuvansh Chandra, Ram Jee Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rachana Katiyar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Considering the submissions advanced by both the parties, it appears, at present applicant is having no apprehension of her arrest, therefore, instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. September 22, 2025 Zafar ABAIL No. 10527 of 2024 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad