Janak Dulari Since Dead Through LRs Lallu Prasad Jaiswal and Ors. v. Ram Bharosh
SA/348/2004 · 2025-09-11
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10511 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10511 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (SA No. 348 of 2004)
2025:CGHC:46989
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 348 of 2004 1 - Janak Dulari Since Dead Through Lrs 1.1 - Lallu Prasad Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Rameshwar Prasad Jaiswal, Aged About 60 Years R/o Balodabazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 1.2 - Rukamani Bai D/o Late Shri Rameshwar Prasad Jaiswal, Aged About 58 Years R/o Balodabazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ............Plaintiffs
--- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Ram Bharosh S/o Shri Gopi Prasad Jaiswal, Aged About 55 Years R/o Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mantora Bai W/o Shri Motilal Jaiswal, Aged About 60 Years R/o Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Munnalal S/o Nathulal Jaiswal, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Singarpur,tah. Bhatapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sashi Bai D/o Nathulal, Aged About 38 Years R/o Lormi, Tah. Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ganesh Ram S/o Shri Gopi Prasad Jaiswal, Aged About 40 Years R/o Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Ghuniya Bai Wd/o Late Gopi Prasad Jaiswal, Aged About 75 Years
R/o
Baloda
Bazar,
Distt.
Raipur, Chhattisgarh ............Defendants
--- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.09.15 10:49:24 +0530
2 (SA No. 348 of 2004) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellants :- None in two rounds. For Respondents :- None in two rounds. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judgment On Board
12.09.2025
1. The matter was called up twice for hearing but none appeared on behalf of the parties. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!