Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10508 (RAJ)

NADEEM S/O BHURJI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3481/2025 · 2025-05-20

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21185] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3481/2025 1. Nadeem S/o Bhurji, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gangora, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Sahil S/o Asmohammad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Punay, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 3. Wasim S/o Raseed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ubhaka, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Deeg.) ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3510/2025 Sahid S/o Saddik, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Solaka, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3657/2025 Farukh S/o Nur Mohammad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Tilakpuri, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. [2025:RJ-JP:21185] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3481/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 20/05/2025 These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.42/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. Learned counsel further submits that the charge- sheet has already been filed and the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that accused- petitioners namely (1) Nadeem S/o Bhurji, (2) Sahil S/o Asmohammad, (3) Wasim S/o Raseed, (4) Sahid S/o Saddik and (5) Farukh S/o Nur Mohammad shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the [2025:RJ-JP:21185] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3481/2025] petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. A copy of this order be placed in each connected files. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /88-90