Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3775 CRL.P No. 200722 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200722 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
YALLAMMA W/O MAREPPA, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O # E 9/3/39, NEAR HUSENA SAB GIRANI, BHOVI ONI, SHORAPUR, DIST.YADGIRI-585224.
2.
MAREPPA S/O SIDDAPPA, AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O # E 9/3/39, NEAR HUSENA SAB GIRANI, BHOVI ONI, SHORAPUR, DIST.YADGIRI-585224.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAJESH G. DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH YADGIR WOMEN POLICE STATION, YADGIR, NOW REPRESENTED BY, ADDITIONAL SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH–585103.
2.
SMT. NINGAMMA W/O AMARESH, AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3775 CRL.P No. 200722 of 2025
R/O SHORAPUR, NOW R/AT LADEG GALLI, YADGIRI-585224.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI ARUNKUMAR AMARGUNDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S. 528 OF BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE ORDER OF TAKING COGNIZANCE DATED 19.02.2025 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIRI IN CC NO.44/2025 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 85, 115(2), 118(1), 75, 109, 190 OF BNSS, 2023, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIRI (ARISING OUT CRIME NO. 53/2024 OF YADGIRI WOMEN POLICE STATION) CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 AND 3 (AS PER CHARGE SHEET) ARE CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
The petitioners are absent.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is present.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3775 CRL.P No. 200722 of 2025
Respondent No.2, along with counsel Sri Arunkumar Amargundappa is present.
There is no possibility of amicable settlement. Noting the same, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo.
Memo reads as under:
“The petitioners may kindly be permitted to withdraw the present petition & liberty may kindly be reserved to file Discharge Application before the trial Court. Hence this memo.”
Placing the memo on record, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
In view of disposal of main petition, pending application, if any, does not survive for consideration.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76 CT:PK