Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10507 (UTT)

DEEPAK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/949/2024 · 2025-03-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.949 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ashish Kumar Jemini, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Pankaj Semwal, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that charge-sheet has been filed against petitioner nos.2, 3 & 4 and the petitioner no.1 has been exonerated after investigation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 6. It is open to the charge-sheeted petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate Forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.03.2025 AK