SUBLIME EDUCATION SOCIETY v. State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/35522/2024 · 2025-02-17
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 105068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 105068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23036 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35522 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sublime Education Society Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Utkarsh Malviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 5.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his school name has been wrongly mentioned in the renewal letter dated 15.07.2021 which is appearing on page 30 of the writ petition. In this respect, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority has not paid any heed to the request of the petitioner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.5 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.5-District Basic Education Officer, Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur, U.P. within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad