Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10502 (CHH)

PADMINI BANJARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER

ACQA/210/2019 · 2025-08-07

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:39768-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 210 of 2019 • Padmini Banjare D/o Late Bahadur Banjare, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Pandri, Post- Pendri, Police Station And Tahsil- Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.). ... Appellant versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Sarsiva, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.). 2. Abhimanyu Banjare @ Mannu S/o Ganesh Narayan Banjare, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Mohtara (S), Police Station Sarsiva, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.). ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondents No.1/State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : None, though served. DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order On Board 08/08/2025 1) The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the Appellant. Even in the second call none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant. CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.08 17:02:50 +0530 2 2) Under these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge -Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Chandrakant