HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38707 of 2024 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Satya Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Rahul alias Durvesh with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.180 of 2024, under Sections 363, 364, 343, 342 IPC and Section 81 of Juvenile Justice Act, Police Station Jarifnagar, District Badaun, during pendency of trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He further submitted that the victim Sanjay, who is son of the informant, was in possession of the co-accused Netra Pal and was recovered from his possession. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit as mention in para-26 of the bail application and is languishing in jail since 30.06.2024. Chargesheet has been filed in this case. Lastly it is submitted that co-accused Netra Pal and Salman have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order s dated 11.09.2204 and 30.09.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.33739 of 2024 and 32602 of 2024. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that victim Sanjay was recovered from the possession of the applicant. He further submitted that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. In Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irshad Ahmad, Nandini Pandey, Satya Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Alias Durvesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping in view uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, bail application is allowed. 6. Considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LawSuit (SC) 677, considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. (ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A I.P.C./269 B.N.S. (iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C./84 B.N.S.S. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A I.P.C./209. B.N.S. (v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the BAIL No. 38707 of 2024 2 opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 7. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 23, 2025 Asha BAIL No. 38707 of 2024 3 (Santosh Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad