DWARKA NATH NAYAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS v. S.P ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS
CR/55/2024 · 2025-03-24
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10501 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10501 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 286 Dwarka Nath Nayar (since deceased) through his legal heirs S.N. Enterprises & Others CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Constitution of India for quashing of the order dated 24.11.2022 (Annexure P7) vide which the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pathankot has framed the additional issue on the basis of amended written statement is liable to be se
2. submits that suit itself stand decided by the learned trial Court decree dated infructuous and
3. 4. 24.03.2025 Sunena
Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Dwarka Nath Nayar (since deceased) through his legal heirs Vs. Enterprises & Others
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Rohit Sapehiya, Advocate
for the petitioner. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present Civil Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed for issuance of appropriate order or direction for quashing of the order dated 24.11.2022 (Annexure P7) vide which the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pathankot has framed the additional issue on the basis of amended written statement is liable to be se
At the very outset, learned counsel for the submits that present petition has been rendered infructuous as the main suit itself stand decided by the learned trial Court decree dated 02.12.2024. As such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-55-2024(O&M) Date of decision: 24.03.2025
Dwarka Nath Nayar (since deceased) through his legal heirs ...Petitioner(s) ...Respondent(s) HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate Civil Revision under Article 227 of the issuance of appropriate order or direction for quashing of the order dated 24.11.2022 (Annexure P7) vide which the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pathankot has framed the additional issue on the basis of amended written statement is liable to be set aside. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner present petition has been rendered infructuous as the main suit itself stand decided by the learned trial Court vide judgment and
02.12.2024. As such, the present petition has been rendered may be disposed of as such. Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of.
(Nidhi Gupta)
Judge 1
Civil Revision under Article 227 of the issuance of appropriate order or direction for quashing of the order dated 24.11.2022 (Annexure P7) vide which the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pathankot has framed the additional petitioner present petition has been rendered infructuous as the main vide judgment and
02.12.2024. As such, the present petition has been rendered SUNENA 2025.03.26 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document