NISAR AHMAD DAR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (SCHOOL EDUCATION) AND ORS
WP(C)/2635/2025 · 2025-10-28
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10498 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10498 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No.116 Supp. List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2635/2025 CM(6945/2025) NISAR AHMAD DAR …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Sheikh Mushtaq, Advocate. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J & K AND ORS.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ruaani Ahmad, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.10.2025
1. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he would feel satisfied in case, if a direction is issued to the respondents to accord due consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner, within some reasonable period, in respect to the averments made in the writ petition.
2. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ruaani Ahmad, Advocate, has caused appearance on behalf of the respondents and submitted that he is not averse if the petition is disposed of with a direction for consideration of the petitioner’s representation in accordance with law.
3. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal at the threshold stage, directing the respondents to accord due consideration to the representation in respect to the averments made in the writ petition, in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date a copy of this petition along with the annexures as also copy of this order are made available to the them.
4. It is however made clear that while according due consideration to the petitioner’s representation, respondents shall take into account and give due weightage to the order dated 11.09.2025 passed by this Court in case titled
“Mohd. Hassan v. UT of J & K & Ors” dated 11.09.2025.
5. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioner through the registered post.
6. Before parting, this Court deems it appropriate to observe that since urgency has been projected by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is expected that the respondents shall take a decision within the aforesaid period expeditiously.
7. Disposed of.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 28.10.2025 ‘Hilal‘