Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10494 (JK)

UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING / JAL SHAKTI) v. GHULAM MOHD MIR AND ANR.

WP(C)/3276/2025 · 2025-12-27

Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 32 SUPPLEMENTARY LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3276/2025 CM(8807/2025) UT OF JK AND OTHERS …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Dar, GA with Ms Shaila Shami, AC Vs. GHULAM MOHD MIR AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. M.A. Beigh, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDE R 27.12.2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for both the sides are ad idem that the controversy raised in this petition is covered by various judgments of this Court, including the judgment passed in WP(C) No. 2416/2024 clubbed with WP(C) No. 3034/2024, decided on 4th April, 2025 titled “Sita Ram & Ors. Vs. UT of JK & Ors”. 2. It is submitted that the judgment passed by this Court in LPA No. 119/2022 titled “UT of JK & Ors Vs. Deshbir Singh & Anr.” dated 22nd September, 2023, which stands upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, by dismissal of SLP (Civil) Diary No. 18074/2024, titled “UT of JK & Ors Vs. Desbhir Singh & Anr.” has already set the issue raised in this petition at rest. 3. In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in Desbhir Singh & Anr. (supra), and a direction is issued to the petitioners to release the amount of recovery, if any, made from the respondent, Ghulam Mohd Mir, forthwith, and, in any case, within a period not exceeding two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petitioners shall be well Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 28.12.2025 within their right to correct the error and re-fix the post retiral benefits, including the pension, if any, by withdrawing the benefit of SRO-59 of 1990. 4. Disposed of. (SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 27.12.2025 “ARIF Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 28.12.2025