SMT POONAM AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/35462/2024 · 2025-02-10
Raj Beer Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104935 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104935 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19226 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35462 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt Poonam And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including N.B.W. dated 03.10.2024, of Complaint Case No. 2431 of 2015, (Varun Kumar Porwal Vs. Devmuni & Others), under Sections 147, 452, 323, 406, 506 I.P.C., pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that prayer made above is not being pressed and that applicants are willing to appear before the trial Court concerned and a direction may be made to the Court concerned to decide the bail applications of applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.
4. In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case, applicants appear/ surrender before the Court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with settled law. For a period of three weeks from today or till the applicants surrender before the Court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in
the aforesaid case.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.2.2025 SK Srivastava Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad