Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104926 (ALL)

TEEKARAM AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/35443/2024 · 2025-05-19

Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84906 Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35443 of 2024 Applicant :- Teekaram And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Yadav,Vandana Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed praying for quashing the summoning order dated 20.06.2024 passed by Additional Civil Judge, (J.D.)-II/J.M. Bareilly, under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Bhuta, District Bareilly in Complaint Case No.558/2024/23 (Mukesh Vs. Teekaram and others), pending before the Additional Civil Judge, (J.D.)-II/J.M. Bareilly. 3. After arguing for sometime, the only prayer sought by the counsel for the applicants is that the applicants are willing to obtain bail after surrendering in the court below, and for that a protective direction may be issued to the concerned trial court to consider and decide the proposed bail application of the applicants. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposes the present application and submits that since the applicants are not cooperating in the court proceedings, summoning order has been issued against the applicants and as such, they deserve no leniency by this Court. 5. Having gone through the rival submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, I do not see any illegality, impropriety and incorrectness in the impugned proceedings under challenge, and there is nothing else which may suggest that there is abuse of court's process. There is no good ground to interfere in the impugned proceedings of the above mentioned case, therefore, the prayer for quashing the order of summoning dated 20.06.2024, is refused. 6. However, on the request of learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants want to surrender in the court below and apply for bail, it is directed that in case the applicants surrender within two weeks from today and apply for bail by moving an appropriate bail application, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned trial court purely on its own merits. For the next two weeks, the proceedings of the aforesaid case against the applicants shall be kept in abeyance. 7. With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 CS/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad