RAM VISHAL AND 2 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/36166/2024 · 2025-02-19
Y K Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104907 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104907 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25390 Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36166 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Vishal And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyvrat Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Achal Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. On an oral prayer counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the prayer clause No. 2 in the writ petition forthwith. Heard Sri Satyvrat Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Achal Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent-Gram Sabha.. The present petition has been filed seeking to assail the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by the Commissioner, Mandal Chitrakoot Dham, Chitrakoot in Case No. 140 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. C20220700000140) [Chandrika Bail and Another Vs. Narayan Prasad and Others], under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue code, 2006 and also the earlier order dated 16.12.2023 passed in proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, passed in Case No. 2229 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202207190302229) [Lalji Vs. Maiyadhar]. It is pointed out by the counsel appearing for the State respondents and the counsel appearing for the respondent-Gram Sabha that the
order passed in the first appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 would be subject to a further remedy of a second appeal and in view thereof the present petition would not be entertainable.
Counsel for the petitioners has not disputed the aforesaid factual and legal position. Accordingly, learned counsel states that he does not wish to press the petition and that the petitioners would avail the appropriate statutory legal remedy in regard to their grievance. The petition stands disposed of. Office to return the certified copy(ies) of the order(s) to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining the photostat copy(ies) of the same.
Order Date :- 20.2.2025 Arun K. Singh [Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.] Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad