Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-10630-2025 1
140 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-10630-2025 Date of decision: 30.09.2025 SAMEER AGGARWAL ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate and Mr. Rehan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of private respondents and their accomplices, who are threatening and harassing the petitioner and his family members and to consider and decide representation dated 25.09.2025 (Annexure P-5) filed by petitioner.
2. Notice of motion.
3. On the asking of Court, Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State and assures that respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District SAS Nagar, Mohali would look into the representation dated 25.09.2025 (Annexure P-5). Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.30 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-10630-2025 2
4. In view of the above, respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District SAS Nagar, Mohali is directed to look into the representation and decide the same on the basis of threat perception felt by the petitioner and if the threat perception is found to be true then the protection as admissible in law shall be provided. In case, the concerned SSP is of the view that no protection is required, then a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner.
5.
Disposed of.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 30.09.2025 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.30 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document