Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104836 (MAD)

Tata Capital Ltd v. JUDE THOMAS BOLDRIN

Arb Appln/811/2024 · 2025-03-05

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb Appln NO. 811 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-01-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Arb Appln NO. 811 of 2024 Tata Capital Ltd 6A , Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam , Appellant(s) Vs Jude Thomas Boldrin 6A , Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam ,Flat 1C Eden Trees Rubi Lane, Thammanam, Ernakulam 682 032. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): M/s.N.K.Vanan K.R.Ramesh Kumar M.Usha Nandini P.Kalaimani For Respondent(s): ORDER The learned counsel for the applicant seeks extension of time for complying with the order. He would also submit that only yesterday, the copy of the earlier order, extending the time was made available by the Registry. 2.In view of the above, time is extended by eight weeks to comply with the order. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln NO. 811 of 2024 3.Registry shall ensure that such extension of time orders are issued within a period of three working days. 08-01-2025 ata To 1. Jude Thomas Boldrin 6A , Dr Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam ,Flat 1C Eden Trees Rubi Lane, Thammanam, Ernakulam 682 032. 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis