Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:126005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No.262) Court No. - 78 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35760 of 2024 Applicant :- Manoj And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of complaint case no.1066 of 2000, under sections 323, 504, 506 and 452 IPC, P.S. Milak, District Rampur on the basis of compromise dated 27.09.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that during the pendency of the instant case before the trial court, the parties have settled their disputes amicably and a compromise dated 27.09.2024 was executed between the parties, which was placed before the trial court concerned and a copy of the same has been annexed as annexure-7 to the instant application. Vide order dated 14.05.2025, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the trial court concerned for verification of the compromise. As per report dated 29.05.2025 received from ACJM/Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Court No.2, Rampur, the said compromise has been verified by the trial court vide order dated 28.05.2025. Thus, learned counsel for the applicant seeks quashing of the entire proceeding on the basis of the said compromise, which has been duly verified in presence of the parties by the trial court. 4. Learned AGA does not oppose the prayer for quashing of the proceeding in view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Having heard the submissions so made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court has carefully gone through the record of the case. From the record of the case, it is apparent that the instant case was lodged by the opposite party no.2 for a minor incident dated 03.01.1999. The parties were neighbours and settled their dispute amicably and a compromise was executed, which has been duly verified by settlement of the dispute. There will be no larger impact on the society and as it was some kine of private dispute between the parties with regard to a minor incident, which do not have a larger impact on the society and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the proceeding pending against the applicants in view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and in the light of the judgments of the Apex Court in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466 : Prabatbhai Aahir Alias Prabatbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and Another , (2017) 9 SCC 641 and Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the instant application deserves to be allowed. 7. In view thereof, the instant application is accordingly allowed and the proceedings of complaint case no.1066 of 2000, under sections 323, 504, 506 and 452 IPC, P.S. Milak, District Rampur, are hereby quashed. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Ashish Pd. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad