Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10482 (CHH)

Rajkumar Lonia v. Ramu Lonia

MA/62/2017 · 2025-07-24

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36291 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 62 of 2017 1 - Rajkumar Lonia S/o Shri Ramu Lonia, Aged About 48 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Phool Bai Lonia W/o Ramu Lonia, Aged About 60 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh .................Plaintiffs ... Appellants versus 1 - Ramu Lonia S/o Late Vishesar Lonia, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Navrangpur Para Aaureha, P.O. Dindori, P.S. Lormi, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shyam Prasad Lonia S/o Late Sevakram Lonia, Aged About 34 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sanjay Lonia S/o Late Sevakram Lonia, Aged About 34 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 4 - Sushil Lonia S/o Late Sevakram Lonia, Aged About 30 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ................Defendants ... Respondents For Appellants : None present For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.07.28 10:27:34 +0530 2 25.7.2025 1. None present for the appellants when the case is called for hearing. Even on repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the matter. 2. In this circumstances, this Court has left with no other option except dismiss the misc. appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, misc. appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chadnravanshi) Judge Bini