%'4, ,-«r- : a 0 APHC010118822007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCAV NO: 131/2007 Appeal under section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984, against the order and decree passed in O.P.No.379 of 2003 dated 22.8.2005, on the file of Family Court-cum- IV Additional & Qistrict Judge, at Vijayawada. FCAMP.No.468 OF 2009: Petition under Section Ofcfer V, Rule - 20 of CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to serve the notice on the respondent by way of publication in the news paper in the interest of justice I: FCAMP.No.297 OF 2007: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner td visit the minor children viz., 1. Sujit Joel, 2. Sushma Jemima on all the weekends and on public Holidays pending disposal of the appeal . - ■ Between: i J. Prasad, S/0. J. Anandam @ Ananda Rao, Aged about 42 years, Occ:private service r/o. Khuddus Nagar, Vijayawada. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND J Vijaya Prasanna Kumari, W/o: J. Prasad, Housewife C/o. Gollamandala r Chinthamani H.No.51-3-16, Near Panchayath Office, Gunadala, Vijayawada-5. ...Respondent/Respondents •' • • ' Counsel for the Appellant: -- Counsel for the Respondent: — The Court made the following: § APHC010118822007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] Wednesday; THE twenty fifth day of june TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO: 131 OF 2007 Between: J. Prasad ...APPELLANT AND ...RESPONDENT J Vijaya Prasanna Kumari Counsel for the Appellant; 1.ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following JUDGMENT; On the direction of this Court, a notice sent to the appellant through the Registry was duly served and instead of engaging an Advocate, the appellant addressed a communication to the Registry that the matter may be disposed of. It appears that nothing survives for adjudication, dismissed for non-prosecution. However, appeal is Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. SDI- S.V.S.R.MURTHY STRAR JOINT //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court-cum- IV Additional & District Judge, at Vijayawada, (with records) 2. J. Prasad, S/0. J. Anandam @ Ananda Rao, Aged about 42 years, Occ;private service r/o. Khuddus nagar, Vijayawada. 3. The Section Officer, V R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. t 4. Two CD Copies PR (gsg) * HIGH COURT DATED: 25/06/2025 JUDGMENT FCA131 of 2007 DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR NON PROSECUTION