[2025:RJ-JP:20402] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3444/2025 Vikram S/o Ramsukh, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Dabak Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg (Present-Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) ----Accused/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant : Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. (for the complainant) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 14/05/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 against the order dated 01.03.2025 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nagar, District Bharatpur in Bail Application No.130/2025 arising out of FIR No.34/2025, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the allegation of causing gun- shot injury to the injured-Mehboob is attributed to the co-accused [2025:RJ-JP:20402] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3444/2025] person Banwari and not to the present accused-applicant. Learned counsel further submits that at the time of alleged incident, the present accused-applicant was said to be present with the main accused-Banwari, however, there is no specific allegation of causing injury to the injured againt the present accused-applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that in this matter, charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel also contends that the age of the accused-applicant is about 19 years and since 18.02.2025, the accused-applicant is behind the bars, therefore, the accused- applicant be granted benefit of bail. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant while vehemently opposing this bail application, contends that the charge-sheet has been filed against the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 109 read with 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; the period of custody of the accused-applicant; the fact that the allegation of causing gun-shot injury to the injured is not attributed to the present accused-applicant and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. 7. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant [2025:RJ-JP:20402] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3444/2025] Vikram S/o Ramsukh, arrested in connection with FIR No.34/2025, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /262-S.