Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10476 (JHR)

DR MRS NEERAJA OJHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/210/2022 · 2025-08-29

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:26146) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil). No. 210 of 2022 Dr.(Mrs) Neeraja Ojha, aged about 64 years, daughter of Mr. Hari Kishore Pandey, wife of Amarendra Nath Ojha, resident of Flat No. 3/C, Neel Kantha Apartment, Tagore Hill Road, Morabadi, P.O. Kanke, P.S. Morabadi, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Shri Kailash Kumar Khandelwal, son of not known to the petitioners, at present posted as Principal Secretary, Higher & Technical Education Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. Shri A. Muthu Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, at present posted as Director, Higher Education, Higher & Technical Education Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 4. Shri C.S.P. Lugun, son of not known to the petitioner, at present holding the post of Secretary of the Governing Body, Gossner College, Ranchi Club Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi. 5. Dr. M.C.Mehta, son of not known to the petitioners, at present holding the post of Registrar, Ranchi University, having its office near Saheed Chowk, PO – G.P.O., PS – Kotwali, District – Ranchi. … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. P-State : Mr. Mr. Gaurav Raj, AC to AAG-II --- 10/29th August 2025 1. The writ petition being W.P.(S). No. 2491 of 2021 was earlier disposed of vide order dated 10.08.2021 by a co-ordinate bench of this Court in terms of the order dated 07.04.2024 passed in W.P.(S). No. 1023 of 2021. 2. Admittedly, the order dated 07.04.2021 passed in W.P.(S). No. 1023 of 2021 has been set aside vide order dated 24.06.2024 passed in LPA No. 245 of 2022 and other analogous cases. 3. It is contention of the petitioner that now he has challenged the aforesaid order in SLP which is pending. 4. Considering the submissions made, since the order of W.P.(S). No. 1023 of 2021 has been set aside in LPA, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out in this case. 5. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands dropped. (2025:JHHC:26146) 2 6. It is open to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum after disposal of this case. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Aditi