Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10476 (AP)

Kunchala Venkaiah v. Kunchala Ramanamma

SA/933/2002 · 2025-01-08

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010119642002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 933/2002 Between: Kunchala Venkaiah and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Kunchala Ramanamma ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. C APPAIAH SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. M RAMAIAH 2. K SESHARAJYAM The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 11.10.2002 passed in A.S.No.14 of 1991 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Kandukuru, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 07.02.1991 passed in O.S.No.172 of 1991 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif Court, Kandukur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:08.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.933 OF 2002 Date:08.01.2025 MS