Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10475 (CHH)

CHIRANJEEV SARKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1482/2025 · 2025-02-27

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9875 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1482 of 2025 1 - Chiranjeev Sarkar S/o Shri C.R. Sarkar Aged About 55 Years R/o D- 9 Sector-2 Ganesh Pooja Ground Avanti Vihar, Raipur (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Agriculture And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Under Secretary, Department Of Agriculture And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director, Department Of Agriculture And Biotechnology, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Under Secretary, Cg Public Service Commission, North Block, Sector 19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. Ali Asgar, Advocate For State :- Ms. Akansha Verma, P.L. For Respondent No.4 :- Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 27.02.2025 VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, fairly submits that against the order of punishment, he has made an appeal before the Chief Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Technology which is pending for consideration, the appeal was filed way back on 05.11.2024, however it is yet to be decided. It is further submitted that a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner to which the reply was also filed, however, no enquiry was conducted straightway and the punishment order was passed, which he has challenged in the appeal. As such, he is praying that the authorities may kindly be directed to consider and decide the said appeal within some stipulated time period. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the concerned Secretary/ competent respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the appeal filed by the petitioner, which is pending since 05.11.2024 expeditiously preferably within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. The petitioner is directed to raise all the aforementioned grounds in the said appeal along with copy of this order before the concerned competent authority. 4. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed off with aforesaid observations and directions. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha