IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1747 of 2025 ====================================================== 1. Anjali Verma wife of Vinod Kumar Yadav, D/o Shivratan Prasad, resident of Sahari, Chaurasia Colonies, New area, P.S.- Nawada, Dist.- Nawada. 2. Gorelal Prasad Son of Ram Briksh Yadav resident of Tika Bigaha, Po. Gopalpur, P.S.- Warisliganj, Dist.- Nawada, Bihar. 3. Md. Mahabub Alam Son of Md. Reyasat Alam residence at Paroriya, P.O.- Merhkuri, P.S.- Sirdala. Dist.- Nawada, Bihar 4. Satyendra Kumar Yadav son of Rajendra Prasad Yadav resident at Egunatar, Post- Rajauli, P.S.- Sirdala, Dist.- Nawada. 5. Pramod Kumar son of Arjun Prasad Yadav resident of vill Pati, P.S.- Akbarpur, Dist.- Nawada. 6. Reena Kumari wife of Rajkishor Singh, Daughter of Ramadhar Singh resident of village- Asadhi, P.S.- Nawada, Dist.- Nawada 7. Wasim Udalia son of Sanaullah resident of Chota Shekhpura, P.S.- Narhat, Dist.- Nawada. 8. Rakesh Raja Kumar Son of Sri Sachitra Nandan Singh resident of Barwali, P.S.- Narhat. Dist.- Nawada. 9. Zaffar Alam Son of Md. Allaudin residence of Kharaut, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Nawada. 10. Krishan Kumar Son of Dukhi Yadav resident of village Panshala, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Nawada, bihar 11. Kanhaiya Kumar Son of indradeo Singh resident of village Kanti, P.S.- Kauakol, Dist.- nawada, Bihar 12. Rajendra Prasad Son of Jagdish Prasad resident of village Baniya Bigha, P.S.- Govindpur, Dist.- Nawada, Bihar 13. Dheeraj kumar Son of Vijay Prasad Singh resident of Beldaha Warsaliganj, Dist.- Nawada, Bihar. 14. Dnesh Kumar Son of Bihari Prasad Yadav resident of village Pati, P.S. Akabarpur, Dist.- Nawada, Bihar. 15. Subodh Kumar Son of Prayag Prasad residence of village- Igunatard, Post rajauli, P.S. Siradala, Dist.- Nawada, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3. The Director General of Home Guard Bihar, Patna. 4. The Inspector General-cum-Additional Commandant General, Home Guard, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Collector, Nawada 6. The District Commandant, Bihar Home Guards, District- Nawada. Patna High Court CWJC No.1747 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/3 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mandal, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 06-02-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned Counsel for the State. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 03.10.2024 passed by respondent No.4. The further prayer has been made to appoint these petitioners as Home Guards under Nawada District. 3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the petitioners have earlier moved before this Hon’ble Court in C.W.J.C. No.11674 of 2024 in which specific direction was given to the Director General of Home Guards, Bihar, Patna to consider the case of the petitioners for their admission as Home Guards, as per their eligibility in accordance with law. 4. Counsel further submits that in compliance of the Hon’ble Court order passed in C.W.J.C. No.11674 of 2024 and in the light of order passed in LPA No.645 of 2021 read with section 4(C)(1) of the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011, the Director General has passed order for 39 persons with specific Patna High Court CWJC No.1747 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2025 3/3 reasons as to why they were not selected. Thereafter, 15 petitioners had again moved before this Hon’ble Court. 5. After going through the pleadings and the records, this Court is of the opinion that in compliance of order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.11674 of 2024 dated 06.08.2024 in case of Sangita Kumari & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar, reasoned order has been passed by the Competent Authority. As such, no remedy left to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition. 6. Hence, this writ petition is devoid of merit. As such, the present writ application stands dismissed. Prakashmani/- (Dr. Anshuman, J.) U