VICKY AGARVAL ALIAS GAURAV KUMAR BARNWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3309/2025 · 2025-04-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10472 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10472 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:12639 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3309 of 2025
------ Vicky Agarval @ Gaurav Kumar Barnwal, aged about 20 years, S/o Abhimanyu Prasad Barnwal @ Avara Barnwal @ Abhimanyu Barnwal, resident of village-Satar Khorsposh, Gurukul Vidyapith Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... ....Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kr. Roy, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 28-04-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gandey P.S. Case No.50 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was assisting in enticing away 17 years old daughter of the informant with intention that the co-accused Mithilesh Turi will marry her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that upon another co-accused Arun Turi @ Arun Kumar the co-accused showing that the Mithilesh Turi and the alleged victim got married; the said co-accused Arun Turi @ Arun Kumar has been admitted to bail. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against Mithilesh Turi. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.01.2025 as is evident from para-05 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl, Judge Pocso Act, Giridih in connection with Gandey P.S. Case No.50 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/