Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10472 (GAU)

MANSUR ALI AHMED v. SMTI SANTOSHI AGARWALLA

I.A.(Civil)/1161/2025 · 2025-06-22

Manish Choudhury, Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010073562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1161/2025 MANSUR ALI AHMED SON OF NIZAMUDDIN AHMED, RESIDENT OF NEAR TV CENTER, CR BUILDING , PS DIBRUGARH, ASSAM PIN 786001 VERSUS SMTI SANTOSHI AGARWALLA WIFE OF SRI SANJAY AGARWALLA , RESIDENT OF MANCOTTA TOM TOM TULA, MANKOTTA ,PS AND DIST DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 2:SRI SANJAY AGARWALLA S/O NOT KNOWN RESIDENT OF MANKOTTA TOM TOM TULA MANKOTTA PO MANKOTTA PS AND DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 78600 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D J DAS, MR. K N CHOUDHURY,N GAUTAM Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R MAZUMDAR (R- 1,2), A PAREEK(R- 1,2),MS T WAPANGLA(R- 1,2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 23.06.2025 [M. Choudhury, J] Page No.# 2/2 Mr. N. Gautam, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that some inadvertent errors have crept in in the interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay. He has sought leave to withdraw the interlocutory application with a further leave to file the application afresh. Mr. A. Pareek, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 & 2 who is in attendance has not objected to the said prayer. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Gautam, the learned counsel for the applicant, the interlocutory application is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant