Mohan v. the state rep by , the inspector of police
CRL OP/26453/2025 · 2025-09-25
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104705 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104705 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.26453 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.26453 of 2025 Mohan ... Petitioner/ A1
Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Walajabad Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No.252 of 2024) ... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in S.C.No.118 of 2024 on the file of the learned Additional District Court, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District in connection with Crime No.252 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. Harish For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath
Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.26453 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.06.2024 in S.C.No.118 of 2024 on the file of the learned Additional District Court, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District, for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 302 of IPC @ 380, 302, 201 and 449 of IPC in Crime No.252 of 2024, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. The earlier bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by this Court, vide order dated 02.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.12882 of 2025. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused trespassed into the house of the deceased, committed murder and taken away 11 sovereigns of gold. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is no way connected to the offence and he is in judicial custody since 03.06.2024. He further submitted that the investigation of this case was completed and charge sheet filed; that the petitioner is ready 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.26453 of 2025 to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and states that it is a case of murder for gain and the petitioner has got 18 previous cases; and that the trial is pending. 5.
Considering the facts, gravity of offence, the previous antecedents of the petitioner, since there is no change of circumstances after the dismissal of the earlier bail application in Crl.O.P.No.12882 of 2025 and the fact that the trial is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 25.09.2025 stn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.26453 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. stn To
1. The Additional District Court, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Walajabad Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No.252 of 2024)
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.O.P. No.26453 of 2025 25.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis