2025:JHHC:11517 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2375 of 2025 ----- Mannu Saw, S/o Tejlal Saw, R/o village-Malho, P.O.-Barkatta, P.S.- Birni, District-Giridih … Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party. CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. …...... 02 /16.04.2025: Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Birni (Bharkatta O.P.) P.S. Case No. 186 of 2024, for offences registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) & (3), 109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The case is pending presently in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner and the medical evidence also doesn’t support the proseuction case. He submits that though there is an allegation that the assault was on the leg but the injury was found in the neck as per the impugned order. 4. After going through the petition and the FIR, I find that this petitioner and others intercepted the brother of the informant and they assaulted them. There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted his brother who is a handicapped person with a rod. 2025:JHHC:11517 2 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail, accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Arpit/