Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12436 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34660 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinod Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chitranshu Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rahul Jain, advocate holding brief of Sri Kunal Ravi Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The present writ petition is filed with the following prayer: "i. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 18.09.2023 passed by respondent no.2. ii. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to directing the respondent no.2 for re-considered the appeal filed on 24.02.2021." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that one Ashok Kumar was disturbing possession of the petitioner on the property in dispute and when complaint was made on the portal the same was rejected on the ground that the sale-deed has been executed in favour of Ashok Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by R.T.I. application sale-deed has been sought. 4. The sale-deed is a registered document and can always be obtained from the office of Sub Registrar. If the order has been passed by the authority concerned, the same is without foundation and petitioner has a remedy to challenge the same. However, copy of the sale-deed cannot be provided under R.T.I. Act as the same can always be applied through procedure provided under the Registration Act. 5. The writ petition being devoid of merit is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 S.Prakash Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad