IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.99 of 2018 ====================================================== H D F C Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Kanti Devi W/o late Yogendra Mandal 2. Asha Kumari D/o late Yogendra Mandal 3. Usha Kumari D/o late Yogendra Mandal 4. Urmila Devi W/o Kokay Mandal, Appellant no. 2 to 3 are minor under the legal guardianship of Appellant no. 1, All Resident of Village- Chatanma, Puraini, P.S. Puraini, District- MadhepuraBihar. 5. Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/o Baudhi Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Chatanma, Ward No. 6, Puraini Bazar, P.S. and P.O. Puraini, District Madhepura. 6. Lootan Sah S/o Anirut Sah Resident of Village- Chatanma, Ward No. 6, Puraini Bazar, P.S. and P.O. Puraini, District Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 04-12-2025 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Shahi duly assisted by Ms. Richa Rani Singh for the appellant. 2. The present appeal has been preferred for the following relief(s): “Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the awarded vide order dated 28.02.2017 and award dated 07.06.2017 passed by Learned Court of Sri Mazhar Imam, District Judge-cum-M.A.C.T., Madhepura in claim case no. 06/14 the appellant Patna High Court MA No.99 of 2018(5) dt.04-12-2025 2/2 prefer the instant Memo of appeal.” 3. It has been informed by the appellant that before the National Lok Adalat, on 13.09.2025, they have arrived at a compromise and the award to this effect have also been provided in that the background, the M.A. No. 99/2018 now has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of. 5. The statutory amount, if any, has to be returned to the appellant. shivam/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U