Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10468 (UTT)

RAJENDRA BHATT AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/935/2024 · 2025-08-25

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:7574 WPCRL No.935 of 2024 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA for the State. 3. No representation for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that charge sheet has been filed in the instant petition, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 25.08.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.08.27 17:55:40 +05'30'