B. MURALI KRISHNA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, v. KANAKADURGA GRAMEENA BANK,
WP/16129/2005 · 2025-01-10
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10468 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10468 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010119502005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16129/2005 Between: B. Murali Krishna, Krishna District, ...PETITIONER AND Kanakadurga Grameena Bank ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SEETHA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K LAKSHMI NARASIMHA The Court made the following ORDER:
There was no representation for the petitioner on the last occasion. Today also, despite the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
2. Sri K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent- Bank is present.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.01.2025 GVK
2
50 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.16129 of 2005
Date: 10.01.2025
GVK
3