Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104666 (PNJ)

SIMRAN SONI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/10537/2025 · 2025-09-26

Aaradhna Sawhney

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-10537 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 113 Simran Soni and another v. State of Haryana CORAM: Present: AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral) 1. petitioners have filed the respondents to decide the representation dated 24.9.2025 (Annexure P 2. Both the petitioners, who are major, got married to each oth with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.9.2025. Their relationship was not approved of by their parents and they expressed their unhappiness. It is in this backdrop that the present petition has been filed by the petitioners. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to r 10537-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Simran Soni and another Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY. Mr. Sumit Singh Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. **** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral) Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, both the petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to decide the representation dated 24.9.2025 (Annexure P The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: Both the petitioners, who are major, got married to each oth with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.9.2025. Their relationship was not approved of by their parents and they expressed their unhappiness. It is in this backdrop that the present petition has been filed by the petitioners. Notice of motion. Ms. Shweta Nahata, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to r IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10537-2025 Date of Decision: 26.9.2025 …Petitioners. …Respondents. HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY. Mr. Sumit Singh Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, both the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to decide the representation dated 24.9.2025 (Annexure P-8). The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: Both the petitioners, who are major, got married to each other in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.9.2025. Their relationship was not approved of by their parents and they expressed their unhappiness. It is in this backdrop that the present petition has been filed by the petitioners. Shweta Nahata, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Date of Decision: 26.9.2025 …Respondents. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, both the present petition with a prayer to direct the official The facts, as can be inferred from the petition, are as follows: er in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.9.2025. Their relationship was not approved of by their parents and they expressed their unhappiness. It is in Shweta Nahata, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the espondent GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.09.26 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10537 No.2-Superintendent of Police, 24.9.2025 (Annexure P that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps w that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. any expression as regards the alleged marriage of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong. 26.09.2025 gbs 10537-2025 -2- Superintendent of Police, Jind, to decide the representation dated 24.9.2025 (Annexure P-8) within a period of two weeks. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. It is, however, clarified that this order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged marriage of the petitioners and shall onfer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong. 26.09.2025 Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable , to decide the representation dated ) within a period of two weeks. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then arranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure It is, however, clarified that this order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged marriage of the petitioners and shall onfer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No , to decide the representation dated ) within a period of two weeks. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then arranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure It is, however, clarified that this order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged marriage of the petitioners and shall onfer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.09.26 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document