[2025:RJ-JP:11777] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3578/2025 Shaitan Lal Jogi S/o Suva Nath, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Shankarpura, Post Arai, Tehsil Arai, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretariat, School Education, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Ajmer. 4. The District Education Officer, Headquarter (Elementary) Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Kapil Kumar Khandelwal Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. G.K. Sharma-AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/03/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in this petition has already been decided by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015 on 01.04.2015. Counsel submits that the instant petition be disposed of in the light of the similar direction as issued in the case of Hemlata Shrimali (Supra). 2. Counsel for the respondents submits that the matter is required to be decided by the authorities concerned on the basis of the facts of the instant case, so instant petition be disposed of [2025:RJ-JP:11777] (2 of 2) [CW-3578/2025] by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Hemlata Shrimali (Supra). Counsel submits that in case, representation is submitted by the petitioner, the respondents may look into the matter and decide the same in accordance with law. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondents authorities. In case, such representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same, expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months thereafter by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/14