Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10463 (UTT)

RAJESHWAR PRASAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/485/2021 · 2025-05-13

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3815-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/485/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Iqram, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Vashisth, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. Mohd. Iqram, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing this writ petition, all the retiral dues of the petitioner have been released. He thus submits that reliefs as claimed in the writ petition do not survive. 3. Mr. Bhupendra Singh Bisht, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 also makes similar statement and submits that now nothing remains to be paid to the petitioner. 4. In such view of the matter and also in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.05.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.05.14 10:22:02 +05'30'