Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104598 (PNJ)

VINEY KUMAR SHARMA v. SUSHMA LATA AND ANR

CR/7376/2023 · 2025-01-13

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 263 Viney Kum Sushma La CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU the impug learned Ci 2020 titled application impleaded the judgme Court in C CR-7376-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision N Date of decision y Kumar Sharma Versus ma Lata and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Ms. Manvi Arora, Advocate fo Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent No.1 proceeded ag dated 19.7.2024). Mr. H.S. Tohra, Advocate for respondent No.2. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present revision impugned order dated 20.10.2023 ( ed Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Ludhiana titled as ‘Sushma Lata vs. Improvem cation filed by the petitioner under eaded as defendant No.2 has been dism Learned counsel for the petiti udgment dated 21.8.2024 passed by CWP No.19955-2024 titled as 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.7376 of 2023 cision :-13.01.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate for ocate eded against ex-parte (vide order vision petition is for setting aside 023 (Annexure P-1) passed by dhiana in Civil Suit No.6609 of provement Trust’ vide which the nder Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for n dismissed. petitioner prays that in view of ed by a Division Bench of this d as ‘Viney Kumar Sharma vs. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.15 09.24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document The Impr permitted t January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CR-7376-2023 Improvement Trust, Ludhiana an itted to withdraw the present petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, 13, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 na and another’, she may per tition. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.15 09.24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document