Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34445 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2024 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Suraj Kumar @ Gahuman Son of Bagha Singh @ Gajendra Kumar Singh Resident of village - Agiaon, P.S.- Agiaon (Garahani), District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Ms. Vaishnavi Singh Mr. Ritwik Thakur For the State : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 04-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Sandesh P.S.Case No.90 of 2024. 3. As per allegation, the petitioner with other accused persons barged into the Union Bank CSP and at the point of pistol, they took out Rs. 2.5 lakh kept in the cash counter and decamped with the same. They also snatched the mobile and golden locket from the neck of the informant. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. His name has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Priyanshu, who had some dispute regarding
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34445 of 2025(5) dt.04-12-2025 2/2 irrigation with the father of the petitioner. The learned counsel further submitted that, except the confessional statement of co- accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. The confessional statement has no evidentiary value in the eye of law, because it is not leading to any recovery. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Except the confessional statement of the co- accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. 7. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sandesh P.S.Case No. 90 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the CrPC/482(2) of the BNSS.
HR/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T