Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104575 (ALL)

SMT. KAMLESH RAO v. CHAIRMAN / MANAGING DIRECTOR. U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15271/2025 · 2025-10-09

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15271 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Supplementary affidavit has been filed learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today, is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhishek Srivastava, learned Chief Standing Counsel-VII for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Shrawan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.3. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "A. Issue a writ orders or directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the terminal benefits of petitioner's husband Late Raj Kapoor Rao to the petitioner, like death-cum-gratuity, bonus, earned leave encashment and group insurance with interest till the date of actual payment is made.. B. Issue any other suitable writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper into the facts and circumstances of the case." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has moved representation before the competent authority, for redressal of her grievance, but nothing has been done till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that he has no objection in case a fresh representation is moved by the petitioner before the competent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : B.S. Pandey, Kartikey Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, Shrawan Kumar Tripathi Smt. Kamlesh Rao .....Petitioner(s) Chairman / Managing Director. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) authority, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division-II, District- Basti, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 10, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 15271 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad