IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.322 of 2025 Decided on: 29th May, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Raju ....Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner alleges non-implementation of judgment rendered in Rakesh Thakur and Anr Vs. HRTC & anr2 . 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record office order dated 27.05.2025, and on that basis submits that petitioner’s services have been regularized after completion of one year of contractual service; His pay has also been re-fixed. That all endeavour 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No. 3138 of 2025, decided on 10.05.2024 - 2 - shall be made by the respondents to take consequential actions on the basis of above office orders within a period of six months from today. Taking note of the above, present Execution Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances , if any, in accordance with law, at an appropriate stage, Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 29, 2025 R.Atal